On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > Thanks very much Will, > > This is what we needed for a long time. > > Inline: > > (2010/02/23 10:26), Will Norris wrote: >> just a heads up that I've added a few mod_rewrite rules to openid.net so >> that the following spec URIs actually redirect to their respective spec >> documents: >> http://openid.net/signon/1.1 >> http://openid.net/sreg/1.0 >> http://openid.net/sreg/1.1 >> http://openid.net/srv/ax/1.0 >> >> >> I'm not sure what to do about the URI for OpenID Auth 1.0, because there is >> no nice HTML version of the spec that I can find. Any suggestions? Just >> redirect it to the 1.1 spec, since it's effectively identical? >> http://openid.net/signon/1.0 >> > I think, redirecting to 1.1 spec is a sensible thing to do. >> >> And the following URIs are use sub-domains, so I can't set them up. If we >> could get someone at OSL to setup CNAMEs and Apache virtual hosts for >> "specs.openid.net" and "schemas.openid.net", I'll get these setup as well: >> http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0 >> http://specs.openid.net/extensions/pape/1.0 >> http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/phishing-resistant >> http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/multi-factor >> http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/multi-factor-physical >> >> Are there any others that I missed? >> > Not that I recall. > > On the side note, we need to set up a spec URL creation rule, I suppose. > I prefer short ones :-)
yes, as the above list shows, there has been little to no consistency with URI naming. I would definitely like to see some kind of common format for any newly minted URIs in the openid.net namespace. (I'm sure this will be a great topic to bring the bike-shedders out of the woodwork) -will _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
