It's a statement about v.Next overall.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 2:42 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Draft charter for v.Next Attributes working group

Joseph,

This sentence troubles me a little:
"Compatibility with OpenID 2.0 is an explicit non-goal for this work"

If users have the right to control what (if any) attributes are exchanged, then 
it seems to suggest they could refuse to convey any, in which case there ought 
to be a high-degree of interoperability with OpenID 2.0.

Can you elaborate on what that sentence really means?  Is this a generate 
statement about v.Next (i.e., the larger team is not interested in preserving 
backward compatibility), or is this a statement applicable only to this WG?

Paul

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Smarr
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 2:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Draft charter for v.Next Attributes working group

Hey guys, I volunteered to drive the "attributes" working group for OpenID 
v.Next, so here's a proposed charter, feedback welcome. Thanks to Mike Jones 
for actually writing up the first draft and getting me to act on it! :) js



(a)  Charter.

(i)              WG name:  OpenID v.Next Attributes

(ii)              Purpose:  Produce attribute transmission and schema 
specifications for OpenID v.Next that address the limitations and drawbacks 
present in the OpenID 2.0 attribute facilities that limit OpenID's 
applicability, adoption, usability, and interoperability.  Sharing basic data 
about the user has become a common enough requirement that OpenID needs to take 
a more hands-on role in specifying common fields and also more tightly/actively 
working on how to propose and accept new standard fields going forward.  
Specific goals are:

* define how to ask for and get rich, consistent, common and extensible data 
attributes,

* define schemas for common attributes,

* define a mechanism and process for using attributes not in this common set,

* enable user control over what attributes are released,

* enable aggregation of attributes from multiple verifiable attribute sources,

* enable the use of attributes by non-browser applications

* enable the use of attributes both with and without employing an active client,

* seamlessly integrate with and complement the other OpenID v.Next 
specifications.

              Compatibility with OpenID 2.0 is an explicit non-goal for this 
work.

(iii)              Scope:  Produce a next generation OpenID attribute 
specification or specifications, consistent with the purpose statement.

(iv)              Proposed List of Specifications:  OpenID v.Next Attribute 
Transmission and Attribute Schema specifications and possibly related 
specifications.

(v)              Anticipated audience or users of the work:  Implementers of 
OpenID Providers, Relying Parties, Active Clients, and non-browser applications 
utilizing OpenID.

(vi)              Language in which the WG will conduct business:  English.

(vii)              Method of work:  E-mail discussions on the working group 
mailing list, working group conference calls, and face-to-face meetings at the 
Internet Identity Workshop and OpenID summits.

(viii)              Basis for determining when the work of the WG is completed: 
 Work will not be deemed to be complete until there is a consensus that the 
resulting protocol specification or family of specifications fulfills the 
working group goals.  Additional proposed changes beyond that initial consensus 
will be evaluated on the basis of whether they increase or decrease consensus 
within the working group.  The work will be completed once it is apparent that 
maximal consensus on the draft has been achieved, consistent with the purpose 
and scope.

(b)  Background Information.

(i)              Related work being done in other WGs or organizations:  OpenID 
Authentication 2.0 and related specifications, including Attribute Exchange 
(AX) and Simple Registration (SReg).  ICF Schemas working group.  Portable 
Contacts.

(ii)              Proposers:

Joseph Smarr, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, Google (chair)

Additional proposers to be added here

(iii)              Anticipated Contributions:  None.


_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to