John,

 

What I did on my own server is, when I log in, I have a check-box that asks
whether I want to stay logged in all the time.  If I check that box, I
return a cookie (over TLS) with a 30-day duration.  When I visit an
OpenID-enabled site and enter my ID, I don't get prompted for a password.
Rather, the browser passes the cookie (again over TLS) and logs me in
automatically.  It also updates the TTL on the cookie.  In effect, I stay
logged in all the time.

 

If I visit my OpenID URL, the server sees that I'm logged in and puts a "log
off" button on the page.  I can click that and the browser cookies get
deleted and the server deletes the associated data. This works pretty well
as a means of logging off.  However, one still has to remember to log off
from each application that might also utilize cookies to keep you logged in.
If web sites only used session cookies with a relatively short TTL and OPs
used cookies like I do, then clicking "log off" on the user's OpenID page
and the closing the browser should effectively serve as a log off for all
applications.

 

It does make use of "cookies" and some people feel cookies are terribly
evil, but for managing session state (i.e., associating users with browser),
it seems to be a fairly reasonable solution - especially if the cookies are
secure.  TLS provides that, though we need something better for HTTP.  I
wrote a draft for that, but it's not moved too far in the IETF (yet):

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-salgueiro-secure-state-management

 

Paul

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 12:58 PM
To: Dick Hardt
Cc: OpenID Specs Mailing List
Subject: Re: OpenID v.Next Core Protocol Charter

 

Single logout is notoriously difficult to get correct.  SAML has never
managed it. 

 

I support looking at it as a option or extension, but would not want to hold
up the core spec for it.

 

Other protocols have expended large amounts of time on it without a solution
that can be understood by the users properly.

 

John B.

On 2010-05-22, at 8:47 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:





Great point Torsten. If there is interest in exploring single logout, then
it likely belongs in this WG.

 

Are others interested in exploring single logout?

 

-- Dick

 

On 2010-05-22, at 2:30 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:





does this or another group consider to incorporate some kind of single
logout support into OpenId?

regards,
Torsten.




At IIW yesterday I held a session on bashing the OpenID v.Nest Core Protocol
Charter. Below is the current draft. Comments and/or questions welcome.
Anyone interested in being a fellow proposer please let me know and I will
add you.

-- Dick

(a)  Charter.

(i)                  WG name:  OpenID v.Next Core Protocol.

(ii)                  Purpose:  Produce a core protocol specification or
family of specifications for OpenID v.Next that address the limitations and
drawbacks present in the OpenID 2.0 that limit OpenID's applicability,
adoption, usability, privacy, and security.  Specific goals are:

.       define message flows and verification methods,

.       enable support for controlled release of attributes,

.       enable aggregation of attributes from multiple verifiable sources,

.       enable support for a spectrum of clients, including passive clients
per current usage, thin active clients, and active clients with OP
functionality,

.       enable authentication to and use of attributes by non-browser
applications,

.       enable the use of public key technology to enhance scalability and
performance,

.       enable optimized protocol flows combining authentication, attribute
release, and resource authorization,

.       define profiles and support features intended to enable OpenID to be
used at levels of assurance higher than NIST SP800-63 v2 level 1 ,

.       define an extension mechanism

.       ensure the use of OpenID on mobile devices,

.       ensure the use of OpenID on existing browsers with URL length
restrictions,

.       complement OAuth 2.0

.       minimize migration effort from OpenID 2.0

.       seamlessly integrate with and complement the other OpenID v.Next
specifications.

              Compatibility with OpenID 2.0 is an explicit non-goal for this
work.

(iii)                  Scope:  Produce a next generation OpenID core
protocol specification or specifications, consistent with the purpose
statement.

(iv)                  Proposed List of Specifications:  OpenID v.Next Core
Protocol and possibly related specifications.

(v)                  Anticipated audience or users of the work:
Implementers of OpenID Providers, Relying Parties, Active Clients, and
non-browser applications utilizing OpenID.

(vi)                  Language in which the WG will conduct business:
English.

(vii)                  Method of work:  E-mail discussions on the working
group mailing list, working group conference calls, and face-to-face
meetings at the Internet Identity Workshop and OpenID summits.

(viii)                  Basis for determining when the work of the WG is
completed:  Work will not be deemed to be complete until there is a
consensus that the resulting protocol specification or family of
specifications fulfills the working group goals.  Additional proposed
changes beyond that initial consensus will be evaluated on the basis of
whether they increase or decrease consensus within the working group.  The
work will be completed once it is apparent that maximal consensus on the
draft has been achieved, consistent with the purpose and scope.

(b)  Background Information.

(i)                  Related work being done in other WGs or organizations:
OpenID Authentication 2.0 and related specifications, including Attribute
Exchange (AX), Contract Exchange (CX), Provider Authentication Policy
Extension (PAPE), and the draft User Interface (UI) Extension.  OAuth, OAuth
WRAP, and OAuth 2.0.  OpenID Connect proposal. SAML 2.0 Core and SAML Authn
Context.

(ii)                  Proposers: 

Dick Hardt, [email protected] (chair)

Michael B. Jones, [email protected]

Breno de Medeiros, [email protected]

Ashish Jain, [email protected]

George Fletcher, [email protected]

 (iii)                  Anticipated Contributions:  None.

 

 
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
  

 

 

_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

 

_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to