I like this Eran, mmmmmmmm,

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]>wrote:

> After much (re)deliberation and discussions, I've decided to drop the
> <Host> element from host-meta. The two reasons why it was there were:
>
> 1. make host-meta self-contained so it can be obtained via other means than
> /.well-known/host-meta
> 2. provide a subject for signatures
>
> Since there are no use cases for #1, and #2 has failed to materialize after
> more than a year of discussions (still no signature profile published), I
> have decided that for the sake of simplicity and practicality to remove the
> element. host-meta doesn't address security and it should not provide a hook
> for future security profiles - that's their job. Those who find a need for
> expressing the subject of a host-meta XRD (or JRD) can add it back in their
> own spec (or make up something else).
>
> -09 dropped the element.
>
> Note that there is going to be a -10 coming out shortly which merges LRDD
> back into host-meta, dropping links from HTTP headers and HTML bodies (which
> don't have any driving use cases).
>
> EHL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 12:45 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt
>
> New version (-09) has been submitted for draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt
>
>
> Diff from previous version:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hammer-hostmeta-09
>
> IETF Secretariat.
>



-- 
http://hi.im/santosh
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to