Hi Eran,
Its not so much about what I want, to me its about what the RPs and end users want since that will ultimately drive adoption and usage. Having talked with some existing and prospective RPs who are trying to follow this discussion, they are having a pretty hard time. Maybe something we could do is create a summary on a wiki like a political ballot initiative. Each group advocating an approach could list the objectives and advantages of their proposal, and the other group could list their perceived disadvantages of that approach. After the document is live we could proactively solicit input from lots of RPs to come and comment on the proposals. Personnally, I’d like to see a way to create an MRD that spans a range of markets and use cases, as I believe Raj Mata and Eric Sachs have advocated, and see if we can come up with one unified core technology approach that is extensible enough to serve all the targeted use cases in a componentized way. If that’s not possible and we have to fork the technology with something like OpenID Connect for social web applications and something like OpenID V.Next for enterprise, ecommerce and government applications, then we should do it in a way that makes it as easy for end users and RPs to make the migration. In any case, I’d like to see all this branded as OpenID or some derivation of OpenID that can be mananged by the OpenID Foundation. The RPs that we’ve talked to would really like a one stop shop place to go for guidance (libraries, deployment guides, test suites, best practices, etc.) on OpenID, OAuth, Portable Contacts, Activity Streams, Discovery, Open Social, etc. It seems like the OpenID Foundation is currently the best place to provide this. So it seems like the market will be better served if we can come together as opposed create competitive approaches and messages. Look forward to input from others. Cheers, Brian *___________* * * *Brian Kissel <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/10/254>* CEO - JanRain, Inc. [email protected] Mobile: 503.342.2668 | Fax: 503.296.5502 519 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 *Increase registrations, engage users, and grow your brand with RPX. Learn more at **www.rpxnow.com* -----Original Message----- From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:54 PM To: Brian Kissel Cc: OpenID Board (public); [email protected] Subject: RE: [OpenID board] Why Connect? I am not sure what this means. As someone in a leadership position within the organization and community, who also have a financial investment in this work, what would *you* like to do? Both options? Pick one? We know who supports each option based on the proposers list. We also know that Dick objects to the OpenID Connect proposal (and I completely respect his well-argued position - I just don't agree with him). It would be helpful if people clearly expressed where they stand on this. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Kissel [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:12 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Dick Hardt; Allen Tom > Cc: Joseph Smarr; OpenID Board (public); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [OpenID board] Why Connect? > > It seems to me that the broader market is coalescing around OpenID as the > brand for open standards-based user managed identity in a B2C > environment. > My take away from the last couple of board meetings is that we should > embrace that, not avoid it. Most RPs and end users don't really care what's > under the hood, they want solutions that address their business and > personal objectives. Let's see how we can best leverage the open standards > work being developed and deployed by a number of stakeholders to address > real market needs and benefits. > > Cheers, > > Brian > ___________ > > Brian Kissel > CEO - JanRain, Inc. > [email protected] > Mobile: 503.342.2668 | Fax: 503.296.5502 > 519 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 > > Increase registrations, engage users, and grow your brand with RPX. Learn > more at www.rpxnow.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eran > Hammer-Lahav > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:11 PM > To: Dick Hardt; Allen Tom > Cc: Joseph Smarr; OpenID Board (public); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [OpenID board] Why Connect? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:openid-specs- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dick Hardt > > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 6:29 PM > > > Labelling this as OpenID seems to be hijacking the OpenID brand. > > And this is where you got it all wrong! Labeling this as OpenID is giving the > OpenID brand once last chance to offer something useful and meaningful > that developers actually use. > > Calling it OAuth Connect would result in hijacking the community. I'm clearly > willing to do that (though my presence here should indicate my interest in > saving the OpenID brand). The question is, is this something the OpenID > community and board wants to risk? > > EHL > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
