As I think of 'policy', everything here meets the definition, ie
prescribed processes and technologies
it sounds like what you want is specific test putting 'privacy policy'
in scope for the certification checklists?
or the possibility of a 'privacy focused profile'?
paul
On 03/06/2010 4:26 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
So I agree, but not sure if we don't have people thinking about the
policy aspects that we will do a good job in this area, thus just
having a conformance I don't think will promote those thoughts
*From:* [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen
*Sent:* Thursday, June 03, 2010 12:28 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Draft charter for OpenID Certification working group
Tony, any of the checklists could stipulate requirements for consent
policy
As does the draft for the trusted email profile
'show at most one page in 99% of the consent flows once the user is
authenticated'
paul
On 03/06/2010 2:42 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
So it seems that Policy was dropped out of the original description of
the charter. The problem is that not factoring in policy concerns more
generally in OpenID v.Next could hurt adoption. An example would be
the lack of prior informed consent for the linking that might occur as
OpenID v.Next goes up the assurance scale, but maybe no one is
interested in OpenID going beyond Level 1.
*From:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Eric Sachs
*Sent:* Friday, May 14, 2010 9:48 AM
*To:* openid-specs
*Subject:* Draft charter for OpenID Certification working group
Resending because a few people complained this message ended up in
their SPAMI Folder.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Eric Sachs* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Draft OpenID Certification working group charter
To: openid-specs <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Allen Tom <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
What follows is a draft charter for the OpenID Certification working
group. Feedback is welcome, as are potential working group
participants. There is also a draft of some specific certification
check lists
<http://docs.google.com/View?id=ajkhp5hpp3tt_72gtng7zff> that I hope
will spawn feedback.
(a) Charter.
(i) WG name: OpenID Certification
(ii) Purpose: Produce certification checklists for the use of
OpenID in different use-cases so that neutral certification bodies
such as OIX can validate IDPs against them as opposed to requiring
each RP to individual perform such an analysis of each potential
IDP. Specific goals are:
Define the checklist for at least one use-case
Have at least one IDP certified against that checklist by a
certification body
Have at least one RP who will dynamically support the published list
of IDP(s) that have been certified
(iii) Scope: Produce a list of certification use-cases, and
checklists for them. We expect this work will identify the need
for additional enhancements to the technical standards, but in
general this WG will not directly develop those standards, but
will coordinate with other OpenID WGs to define the necessary
standards.
(iv) Proposed List of Use-Cases: The initial targeted use-cases
are listed below based on discussion
<https://sites.google.com/site/oauthgoog/UXFedLogin/whitelisting> from
the April 2010 OpenID Summit and a later draft proposal
<http://docs.google.com/View?id=ajkhp5hpp3tt_72gtng7zff>.
Trused Email Profile
Email Validation Profile
Untrusted Email Profile
URL only Profile
Email Hosting Profile
(v) Anticipated audience or users of the work: Implementers of
OpenID Providers, Relying Parties, and certification bodies.
(vi) Language in which the WG will conduct business: English.
(vii) Method of work: E-mail discussions on the working group
mailing list, working group conference calls, and face-to-face
meetings at the Internet Identity Workshop and OpenID summits.
(viii) Basis for determining when the work of the WG is completed:
Work will not be deemed to be complete until there is a consensus
that the resulting set of use-caess (and checklists) are
sufficient to meet the market needs for OpenID certification.
Additional proposed use-cases behond the initial list are expected.
(b) Background Information.
(i) Related work being done in other WGs or organizations: ICAM,
InCommon, Open Identity Exchange (OIX), Kantara
(ii) Proposers:
Eric Sachs, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
Google (chair)
Allen Tom, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Additional proposers to be added here
(iii) Anticipated Contributions: None.
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2915 - Release Date: 06/03/10 02:25:00
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2915 - Release Date: 06/03/10
02:25:00
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
