>> I'm not seeing much difference from your list to the charter that was submitted Allen's wiki page provides pointers to specific technical work being done to meet those requirements, as well as identifying work that is not yet being done. As you noted, though, the business requirements for a future version of OpenID have been mostly unchanged since the Fall 2009 IIW discussions.
In his message he noted that we still need more people to "get involved in flushing out the technical details." Only a few people like Nat Sakimura have really been active in those details the last few weeks. We are hoping that if the community sees more consensus on technical direction, it will attract more technical contributors. >> Maybe a simpler approach is to start fresh on OAuth for authentication http://www.goland.org/adhocauthentication/ and discovery http://www.goland.org/simplewebfinger/ Any chance we could recruit Yaron to get involved in spec work? We are really short of people to actually work on specs in the next few months because of vacations, and the other tasks people are working on. The adhocauthentication uses the same "OpenID on top of OAuth2" approach described in the OpenIDConnect proposal. However that article and the simplewebfinger article go into more detail on discovery which is an area where we always seems to have trouble recruiting spec developers. We tend to rely on Eran Hammer-Lahav to drive most of that work on his own. Since Yaron's contributions to the sessions on OAuth in the spring 2009 IIW we're so crucial in kicking off the WRAP, and then OAuth2 discussions, and now the OpenIDConnect discussions, he would be a great person to have helping us. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm a little confused; I'm not seeing much difference from your list to the > charter that was submitted > http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/2010-May/000272.htmlso > not sure what this list represents, can you give us some background as I > did not see these discussions going on while the charter was being > discussed. > > Maybe a simpler approach is to start fresh on OAuth for authentication > http://www.goland.org/adhocauthentication/ and discovery > http://www.goland.org/simplewebfinger/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Allen Tom > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 6:58 PM > To: OpenID Specs Mailing List > Subject: Requirements discussion of OpenID Future > > Hi All, > > There¹s been a lot of discussion the past few weeks around specific > technical proposals focused on moving OpenID forward. We wanted to take a > step back and make sure that we understand the problems that there are broad > consensus around solving over the next six to nine months. While there has > also been some discussion around use cases and charters, there hasn¹t yet > been broad consensus. > > Today Yahoo!, Google, and Facebook met with some of the authors of Artifact > Binding, the OpenID Connect proposal, and OAuth 2.0 to discuss our specific > future requirements. We put together a summary document of 20+ items that > we would like to see and wanted to start a discussion around them. Today > helped to verify our instinct that we could achieve these OpenID goals by > layering features on top of OAuth 2.0 while specifically maintaining the > decentralized nature of OpenID. > > After this discussion it seems that the Connect work group charter can > encompass this work and thus provides a mailing list and IPR policy to work > on these items. Facebook, Google, and Yahoo! expect to be able to sign the > contributor agreements for the OpenID Connect working group relatively soon. > > We hope that other OpenID community members and organizations will provide > feedback on how this list compares to their needs and/or get involved in > flushing out the technical details. > > Here's the list of features that we would like to see implemented in a > future version of OpenID: > > http://wiki.openid.net/Future-OpenID-Technical-Requirements > > Feedback and discussion is more than welcome! > > Allen > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
