Am I reading it wrong or do you mean it drops off at 16MB, not 16 KB? Mike
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 09:44 -0400, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > What was serving the nfs and iscsi? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary [mailto:gdri...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 2:29 AM > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots > > iSCSI & NFS are roughly comparable until you get to 16KB file sizes > and above. This is when NFS starts to drop off drastically for read > performance without any caching. > > Here's an NFS I/O test on a 1Gb ethernet link and file sizes from 64k > to 16Gb: http://preview.tinyurl.com/44upb5f > > Here's an iSCSI I/O test on the same hardware, same network, same back > end file server but using the different protocol: > http://preview.tinyurl.com/5r69m6j > > -Gary > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss