James Carlson wrote: > For what it's worth (and having worked on the code in the now-distant > past), I certainly agree with you at a high level. What you're > describing is an "obvious" generalization of the exclusive stack > concept. It was "obvious" enough that we actually discussed it > internally when the feature was being added. Testing complexity and > lack of a clear use-case were the main factors in deciding not to > generalize.
A good amount of the architectural discussion is still available on-line: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2006/366/ (At least, I guess, until someone notices ...) -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
