Le 2013/11/21 16:17 +0100, Jim Klimov a écrit:
On 2013-11-21 12:08, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Regarding the documentation: I have scanned most of what's there by
now but I
actually don't find the ACL approach not too intuitive and definitely
not halfway
as simple as with the Samba notation "valid users = stefan, jim".
Indeed, no. But also it is more flexible since at the filesystem level
you can change the (inherited or end-node) rights to something else
for some aprticular files or directories. Maybe, for writable shares
you can allow "@everyone" and then just enforce filesystem access to
browse/read/write as if those were local accesses i.e. over SSH shells?
It's two different things, though. In the Windows world, you have access
permissions for the share, and then on the contents of that share, you
have ACLs.
One is not a substitue for the other (particularly because users can
mess with the ACL whereas they cannot with the share permissions).
Laurent
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
