On 09/25/14 03:48 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:

Recent discussions seem to lead to a general security concern
with the crippled bash parser, so there nearly certainly will
be more and more security issues in the next days to come up.
I think the better alternative is to provide 'dash' and symlink
bash to dash instead, as dash much cleaner, faster, and POSIX -
compliant. Although, as it has not been widely used as bash
yet, could have its own bugs not yet discovered....

Unfortunately, 'dash' is not completely compatible with scripts written for 
'bash'.  It is not clear to my why people write shell
scripts targeting bash, but it seems to happen often.

Bob

Probably because they are coming from Linux background...

I had to leave ksh because of that ...

Regards.

--
Predrag Zečević, Technical Support Analyst, 2e Systems GmbH

Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894
Mobile:    +49  174 3109 288,     Skype: predrag.zecevic
E-mail:    predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com

Headquarter:          2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87,
                      65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany
Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303
Managing director:    Phil Douglas

http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly!

[***]===---
Never put off till run-time what you can do at compile-time. -- D. Gries

_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to