Hi, perhaps it is time to start compiling virtualbox ourselves to avoid any such problems? I also wonder what problems would we see thanks to illumos identifying itself as Solaris 11. Any volunteer on this?
It would be good to sync up with tomww of SFE on this. (I talked to him some time ago that when he had nothing left to package, he could have a look on vbox as it will be much easier for everyone). Cheers, Adam > On 08 Sep 2016, at 15:32, Peter Tribble <peter.trib...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems > Administrator <predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com> wrote: > > >> QT5 is required for VirtualBox 5.1 (https://www.illumos.org/issues/7145) > > Not so. VirtualBox 5.1 includes QT5; the problem is that it doesn't work > right. > > I'm wondering if this is another case of 5709/7165. It looks like the > VirtualBox > binaries were built on S10U10, as they're looking for asprintf. > > https://www.illumos.org/issues/5709 > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
