Ok, so I investigated further.

It seems that the NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-304.137 package bundle does not
include libEGL.so.1, but versions 390.138 and 340.108 do.

But since X is actually working, is this an issue with lightdm?

/tony


On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 06:36 +0000, Tony Brian Albers wrote:
> Good morning,
> 
> So I managed to find an old nvidia card, and I got the nvidia driver
> installed. I followed the notes here:
> https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Nvidia+Graphics
> 
> But to uninstall driver/graphics/nvidia, I also had to remove xorg-
> video (meta package).
> 
> During the 'bootadm update-archive -R /mnt' step, it reported that
> the
> driver was 32-bit and would be excluded.
> 
> After that, and a reboot, lightdm won't start.
> 
> Xorg works, running startx when logged in gives me a nice twm
> desktop.
> Also, Xorg.0.log states that the nvidia driver 304.137 is actually in
> use.
> 
> But lightdm -not so much.
> From /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log :
> 
> ** Message: 07:24:18.123: [Configuration] Reading file:
> /etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf
> ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: libEGL.so.1: open failed: No
> such
> file or directory
> ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
> /usr/lib/64/libcairo.so.2: symbol eglGetProcAddress: referenced
> symbol
> not found
> ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
> /usr/lib/64/libgtk-3.so.0: symbol cairo_pattern_destroy: referenced
> symbol not found
> ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
> /usr/sbin/lightdm-gtk-greeter: symbol gtk_init: referenced symbol not
> found
> 
> Which is odd, since it used to work.
> Using ldd on /usr/sbin/lightdm-gtk-greeter, it reports:
> 
> libEGL.so.1 =>   (file not found)
> 
> And chasing down the symbolic links, I get:
> 
> root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/lib/64/libEGL.so.1
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          23 aug. 23 12:52
> /usr/lib/64/libEGL.so.1 -> ../GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1
> 
> root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          48 aug. 23 12:52
> /usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1 ->
> ../../../../var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1
> 
> root@emu:/usr/X11/lib# ls -l /var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1 
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          37 aug. 25 07:24
> /var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1 ->
> /usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1
> 
> root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1
> /usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1: No such file or directory
> 
> Hmm..
> 
> So, what package is supposed to provide this?:
> 
> root@emu:/var/log/lightdm# pkg search -l libEGL.so.1
> INDEX      ACTION VALUE                          PACKAGE
> basename   link   usr/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1      pkg:
> /service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
> basename   link   usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1   pkg:
> /service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
> basename   link   usr/lib/GL/libEGL.so.1         pkg:
> /service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
> basename   link   usr/lib/libEGL.so.1            pkg:
> /service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
> basename   link   usr/lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1 pkg:
> /x11/library/mesa@13.0.6-2020.0.1.7
> basename   link   usr/lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1       pkg:
> /x11/library/mesa@13.0.6-2020.0.1.7
> 
> Looking closer at these, it seems that only the files from "mesa" are
> actual files. The others are just symlinks.
> These are the 'real' ones:
> 
> root@emu:/usr# ls -l lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          15 aug. 23 12:52
> lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1 -> libEGL.so.1.0.0
> 
> root@emu:/usr# ls -l lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL*
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          15 aug. 23 12:52
> lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so -> libEGL.so.1.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          15 aug. 23 12:52
> lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1 -> libEGL.so.1.0.0
> -r-xr-xr-x   1 root     bin       224736 aug. 23 18:32
> lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1.0.0
> 
> root@emu:/usr/lib/mesa/amd64# file libEGL.so.1.0.0
> libEGL.so.1.0.0:        ELF 64-bit LSB dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1,
> dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available
> 
> 
> So it seems that the files are there, but the symlinks are incorrect.
> 
> It looks like the libs from the mesa package are never found.
> 
> 
> What could be the cause of this and how do I fix it?
>  
> TIA,
> 
> /tony
> 
-- 
Tony Albers - Systems Architect - IT Development
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Tel: +45 2566 2383 - CVR/SE: 2898 8842 - EAN: 5798000792142
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to