On 2021-01-20 09:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
Please do a little investigation before you post and don't let your plain
hatred
for someone to ruin your investigation.
I didn't asked to add any Linux shell at all. Please keep that in mind.
I might suggest you try the default (Free)BSD shell; t/csh. While FreeSBD
calls it
csh, the differences really only appear in their name. I do the following
on
To clarify, the personal login shell that a user choses has nothing to do
with the
shell which is normally used when building software. So changing the login
shell
will not change the software build performance.
The tcsh shell is great for interactive use but few scripts are written
using its
syntax any more.
For purposes of Autoconf (popular 'configure' scripts), the shell to may be
specified by the CONFIG_SHELL environment variable or configure command
argument.
For example:
CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh ./configure ....
./configure CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh ...
Changing the SHELL environment variable itself may also cause a change to
execution since it influences the default shell that the system uses which
invoking a command (e.g. using system()) which uses the shell.
I *totally* agree. I guessed when it was mentioned that "looking for..."
took forever. That it would be (gnu|auto)conf. Which spawn all kinds of
queries:
cc -V && awk '{print $...
While /bin/sh seems to be the one I most encounter, complex bash scripts are
the
other, and mostly because the scripts/source originated from a Linux
developer.
Whom is most acquainted with bash, as it's their default shell. So the
question
*really* becomes; why the difference on OI?
I'm going to be doing a great deal of building today. So hope to gain some
insight
during the process.
--Chris
Bob
--
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
