On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:35:20 -0600
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Make sure to delay a little in the IPMI poll routine so we can pass in
> a timeout time and thus time things out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6.orig/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,12 @@ static void poll(void *send_info)
>  {
>       struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
>  
> -     smi_event_handler(smi_info, 0);
> +     /*
> +      * Make sure there is some delay in the poll loop so we can
> +      * drive time forward and timeout things.
> +      */
> +     udelay(10);
> +     smi_event_handler(smi_info, 10);
>  }

I don't understand what this patch is doing.  It looks fishy.  More
details, please?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to