Jean Delvare wrote:
> Which version of lm-sensors have you been using for your test? Versions
> from 2.9.1 to 2.10.4 (inclusive) are annoyingly shifting channel
> numbers by one for bmc. This doesn't explain everything you observed,
> but could still have interfered with your diagnostics. So I suggest
> that you try either lm-sensors SVN (either the stable branch or the
> upcoming 3.0 version):
> http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors/snapshots/lm-sensors-r4912-20071002.tar.bz2
> http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors-3/snapshots/lm-sensors-3-r4914-20071002.tar.bz2
>
Jean,
thanks for your reply :) I was using 2.10.4, but installed the snapshot
now. This is way beyond me, but I got a quite different result now:
bmc-isa-0003
Adapter: ISA adapter
SCSI-N Volt:
+1.33 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard 1.5V:
+1.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard 2.5V:
+1.89 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard 3.3V:
+3.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard 12V:
+15.68 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard 5V:
+4.79 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
Baseboard -12V:
-12.11 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V)
PwrShare Fan 3:
4680 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
PwrShare Fan 2:
2520 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
PwrShare Fan 1:
2520 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 6:
2610 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 7:
2730 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 8:
2850 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 5:
2880 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 3:
2730 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 4:
2970 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
Baseboard Fan 1:
2760 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
PwrShare Temp:
-12.8°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Processor 4 Temp:
+6.1°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Processor 3 Temp:
+2.6°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Processor 2 Temp:
+2.6°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Processor 1 Temp:
+2.5°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Basebrd PXB Temp:
+2.4°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
Basebrd PCI Temp:
+3.0°C (high = +0°C, hyst = +0°C)
The voltages looks a little better (Probably still wrong, but I have no
idea), but the temperatures were better earlier ;) But that might be
another bug in lm-sensors with regard to bmc? Or is that an ipmisensors
workaround to get past a lm-sensors bug that is now fixed?
I'll have to wait untill I'm back home to see if each sensor now
corresponds to the right label in lm-sensors.
Thanks for the help :)
Regards,
Stian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
