Yes, it's a problem, but wrong fix.  Thanks, I'll send a patch for it.

-corey

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes obviously dead code spotted by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
>  include/linux/ipmi_smi.h |   10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h.old    2007-10-21 23:03:03.000000000 
> +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h        2007-10-21 23:05:59.000000000 
> +0200
> @@ -158,44 +158,38 @@ static inline int ipmi_demangle_device_i
>       if (data_len < 9)
>               return -EINVAL;
>       if (data[0] != IPMI_NETFN_APP_RESPONSE << 2 ||
>           data[1] != IPMI_GET_DEVICE_ID_CMD)
>               /* Strange, didn't get the response we expected. */
>               return -EINVAL;
>       if (data[2] != 0)
>               /* That's odd, it shouldn't be able to fail. */
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       data += 3;
>       data_len -= 3;
>       id->device_id = data[0];
>       id->device_revision = data[1];
>       id->firmware_revision_1 = data[2];
>       id->firmware_revision_2 = data[3];
>       id->ipmi_version = data[4];
>       id->additional_device_support = data[5];
> -     if (data_len >= 6) {
> -             id->manufacturer_id = (data[6] | (data[7] << 8) |
> -                                    (data[8] << 16));
> -             id->product_id = data[9] | (data[10] << 8);
> -     } else {
> -             id->manufacturer_id = 0;
> -             id->product_id = 0;
> -     }
> +     id->manufacturer_id = (data[6] | (data[7] << 8) | (data[8] << 16));
> +     id->product_id = data[9] | (data[10] << 8);
>       if (data_len >= 15) {
>               memcpy(id->aux_firmware_revision, data+11, 4);
>               id->aux_firmware_revision_set = 1;
>       } else
>               id->aux_firmware_revision_set = 0;
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* Add a low-level interface to the IPMI driver.  Note that if the
>     interface doesn't know its slave address, it should pass in zero.
>     The low-level interface should not deliver any messages to the
>     upper layer until the start_processing() function in the handlers
>     is called, and the lower layer must get the interface from that
>     call. */
>  int ipmi_register_smi(struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers,
>                     void                     *send_info,
>                     struct ipmi_device_id    *device_id,
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to