On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:27:49 -0600 Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch prevents deadlocks in IPMI panic handler caused by msg_lock > in smi_info structure and waiting_msgs_lock in ipmi_smi structure. Again, what are the newly-added barrier()s for? Was cpu_relax() intended? If a barrier indeed was intended then, as always, each one should have a comment explaining why it is there. Because it is frequently hard to determine what the programmer was trying to do. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
