Martin Wilck wrote: > Hi Corey, > > yesterday I posted some results about the IPMI performance under CPU > load, which can be up to 25 times slower than in an idle system. I think > it might be worthwhile to try to improve that behavior as well. > Yes, that would be expected, as kipmid would never be scheduled in a busy system, and it would just be the timer driving things.
> I made a variation of my patch which introduces a second parameter > (kipmid_min_busy) that causes kipmid not to call schedule() for a > certain amount of time. Thus if there's IPMI traffic pending, kipmid > will busy-loop for kipmid_min_busy seconds, then starting to schedule() > in each loop as it does now, and finally go to sleep when > kipmid_max_busy is reached. At the same time, I changed the nice value > of kipmid from 19 to 0. > I would guess that changing the nice value is the main thing that caused the difference. The other changes probably didn't make as big a difference. > With this patch and e.g. min_busy=100 and max_busy=200, there is no > noticeable difference any more between IPMI performance with and without > CPU load. > > The patch + results still need cleanup, therefore I am not sending it > right now. Just wanted to hear what you think. > I'm ok with tuning like this, but most users are probably not going to want this type of behavior. -corey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
