Bjorn Helgaas emitted: > I disagree that this requirement was lost....
Sorry, my words did not convey my intended meaning, which was that "conformance" or "coherence" was lost, with SPMI also being listed in ACPI general namespace. You actually stated this with greater clarity: > There may be firmware that has an SPMI but neglects to put the device > in the namespace. That may be the case on some legacy servers. Rocky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
