On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:00:34 +0100 Matthew Garrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Relying upon link ordering is the old-fashioned way of doing things, > > and I have vague memories that it only works by luck - that there's no > > hard-and-fast rule that the linker has to obey what we think we asked > > it to do. > > > > The usual way of doing this sort of thing is to use the initcall > > priority levels - core_initcall(), postcore_initcall(), etc. Can that > > be done here? > > Not really - some of this code can be built as modules, so it's mostly > module_init rather than anything from the initcall family. > hm. So the ACPI code has found a way to defeat depmod? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
