On 11/08/2017 11:11 AM, Andrew Banman wrote:
On 11/8/17 11:06 AM, Andrew Banman wrote:
If there are uninitialized SMIs in the smi_infos list, i.e. with no
handlers set, then disable_si_irq() in cleanup_smi_one() will hit a null
pointer dereference when the former attempts to start the check enables
transaction. Thus, we panic during module exit.

I think this points to a broader problem of holding uninitialized smi_info structs in smi_infos list. There are many places where handlers and other struct members are assumed. Maybe a better design would be to remove SMIs from the list
if we have no intention of initializing them?


This begs the question: How did you produce this?  From what I can tell,
there is no way you can get to this code if you don't have a working and
initialized smi_info structure, and that's not the only place this would
have to be fixed if it wasn't.  So it's not what you assume, I don't think
it's an uninitialized smi_info structure on the list.

As usual with these sorts of things, please send tracebacks and reproduction
procedures.

If you are removing the module and this happens, there may be a race
conditions, but this is the wrong fix.  More likely that the structure gets
cleaned up and this function is called afterwards.

-corey

Andrew


Avoid panicking when there are uninitialized SMIs by checking for a handler
pointer before starting the check enables transaction.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Banman <aban...@hpe.com>
---
  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
index cb5719e..6c0b1b3 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static void start_check_enables(struct smi_info *smi_info, bool start_timer)

      if (start_timer)
          start_new_msg(smi_info, msg, 2);
-    else
+    else if (smi_info->handlers)
smi_info->handlers->start_transaction(smi_info->si_sm, msg, 2);
      smi_info->si_state = SI_CHECKING_ENABLES;
  }



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to