On 02/14/2018 11:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Thanks, queued for next release.

-corey

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465255 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was compiled with GCC 7.3.0

  drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
index 3a3498a..6476bfb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void kcs_bmc_handle_data(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc)
        switch (kcs_bmc->phase) {
        case KCS_PHASE_WRITE_START:
                kcs_bmc->phase = KCS_PHASE_WRITE_DATA;
+               /* fall through */
case KCS_PHASE_WRITE_DATA:
                if (kcs_bmc->data_in_idx < KCS_MSG_BUFSIZ) {



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to