On 02/26/2018 02:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 18:07 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 09:49 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 01/22/2018 06:56 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Replace home grown set_prop_entry() macro by generic
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER()-like ones.

Cc: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
With the changes to property.h, this is good, a definite
improvement.
I'll
let you handle getting this in, as the property.h change doesn't
belong
in my tree.  Thanks.

Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
Thanks! I will take care of this, or otherwise it will go cycle after
next.
It seems the main patch will be material for next cycle.
Thus, can you apply this one now?

Dependency is in upstream: c505cbd45f6e

Ok.  I was assuming you were going to request merge on this patch, but I
can add it to my tree.

By "now", do you mean for 4.16, or 4.17?  If the change doesn't go in,
will something break?

Thanks,

-corey


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to