-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay Khemka <vijaykhe...@fb.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 1:58 AM
To: miny...@acm.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>; Greg Kroah-Hartman 
<gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net; 
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; cminy...@mvista.com; Asmaa Mnebhi 
<as...@mellanox.com>; j...@jms.id.au; linux-asp...@lists.ozlabs.org; Sai Dasari 
<sdas...@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: ipmi: Support for both IPMB Req and Resp



On 11/5/19, 4:54 PM, "Corey Minyard" <tcminy...@gmail.com on behalf of 
miny...@acm.org> wrote:

    On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:47:31AM -0800, Vijay Khemka wrote:
    > Removed check for request or response in IPMB packets coming from
    > device as well as from host. Now it supports both way communication
    > to device via IPMB. Both request and response will be passed to
    > application.
    > 
    > Signed-off-by: Vijay Khemka <vijaykhe...@fb.com>
    > ---
    >  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmb_dev_int.c | 29 +----------------------------
    >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 28 deletions(-)
    > 
    > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmb_dev_int.c 
b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmb_dev_int.c
    > index 285e0b8f9a97..7201fdb533d8 100644
    > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmb_dev_int.c
    > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmb_dev_int.c
    > @@ -133,9 +133,6 @@ static ssize_t ipmb_write(struct file *file, const 
char __user *buf,
    >   rq_sa = GET_7BIT_ADDR(msg[RQ_SA_8BIT_IDX]);
    >   netf_rq_lun = msg[NETFN_LUN_IDX];
    >  
    > - if (!(netf_rq_lun & NETFN_RSP_BIT_MASK))
    > -         return -EINVAL;
    > -
    >   /*
    >    * subtract rq_sa and netf_rq_lun from the length of the msg passed to
    >    * i2c_smbus_xfer
    > @@ -203,28 +200,6 @@ static u8 ipmb_verify_checksum1(struct ipmb_dev 
*ipmb_dev, u8 rs_sa)
    >           ipmb_dev->request.checksum1);
    >  }
    >  
    > -static bool is_ipmb_request(struct ipmb_dev *ipmb_dev, u8 rs_sa)
    > -{
    > - if (ipmb_dev->msg_idx >= IPMB_REQUEST_LEN_MIN) {
    > -         if (ipmb_verify_checksum1(ipmb_dev, rs_sa))
    > -                 return false;
    
    You still need to check the message length and checksum, you just need
    to ignore the req/resp bit.
Yes you are right, I was looking for checksum code after removing it __. I will 
modify it.

Besides Corey's comment, looks good to me. The logic should be something like 
this:
static bool is_ipmb_msg(struct ipmb_dev *ipmb_dev, u8 rs_sa)
 {
         if (ipmb_dev->msg_idx >= IPMB_REQUEST_LEN_MIN) {
                 if (ipmb_verify_checksum1(ipmb_dev, rs_sa))
                         return false;
         } else {
                 return false;
         }
         return true;
}
    
    -corey
    
    > -
    > -         /*
    > -          * Check whether this is an IPMB request or
    > -          * response.
    > -          * The 6 MSB of netfn_rs_lun are dedicated to the netfn
    > -          * while the remaining bits are dedicated to the lun.
    > -          * If the LSB of the netfn is cleared, it is associated
    > -          * with an IPMB request.
    > -          * If the LSB of the netfn is set, it is associated with
    > -          * an IPMB response.
    > -          */
    > -         if (!(ipmb_dev->request.netfn_rs_lun & NETFN_RSP_BIT_MASK))
    > -                 return true;
    > - }
    > - return false;
    > -}
    > -
    >  /*
    >   * The IPMB protocol only supports I2C Writes so there is no need
    >   * to support I2C_SLAVE_READ* events.
    > @@ -273,9 +248,7 @@ static int ipmb_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
    >  
    >   case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
    >           ipmb_dev->request.len = ipmb_dev->msg_idx;
    > -
    > -         if (is_ipmb_request(ipmb_dev, GET_8BIT_ADDR(client->addr)))
    > -                 ipmb_handle_request(ipmb_dev);
    > +         ipmb_handle_request(ipmb_dev);

Keep this line.
    >           break;
    >  
    >   default:
    > -- 
    > 2.17.1
    > 
    


_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to