On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:07:50PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > __ipmi_bmc_register() jumps to the label 'out_free_my_dev_name' in an > > > error path. So we can remove duplicate code in the if (rv). > > > > Looks correct, queued for next release. > > 1. Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description? > > 2. Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message? > > 3. Did you avoid a typo in the patch subject? > > Regards, > Markus
Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
