On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:21:31PM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Hi Corey, > > On Mon, 10 May 2021, at 15:11, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is the 3rd spin of the series refactoring the keyboard-controller-style > > device drivers in the IPMI subsystem. > > > > v2 can be found (in two parts because yay patch workflow mistakes) at: > > > > Cover letter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210319061952.145040-1-and...@aj.id.au/ > > > > Patches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210319062752.145730-1-and...@aj.id.au/ > > > > Several significant changes in v3: > > > > 1. The series is rebased onto v5.13-rc1 > > > > 2. v5.13-rc1 includes Chiawei's patches reworking the LPC devicetree > > bindings, > > so they're no-longer required in the series. > > > > 3. After some discussion with Arnd[1] and investigating the serio subsystem, > > I've replaced the "raw" KCS driver (patch 16/21 in v2) with a serio > > adaptor > > (patch 11/16 in this series). The adaptor allows us to take advantage of > > the > > existing chardevs provided by serio. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/37e75b07-a5c6-422f-84b3-54f2bea0b...@www.fastmail.com/ > > > > Finally, I've also addressed Zev Weiss' review comments where I thought it > > was > > required. These comments covered a lot of minor issues across (almost) all > > the > > patches, so it's best to review from a clean slate rather than attempt to > > review > > the differences between spins. > > I backported this series for OpenBMC and posting those patches provoked > some feedback: > > * A bug identified in patch 9/18 for the Nuvoton driver where we enable > the OBE interrupt: > > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/hk2pr03mb4371f006185adbbf812a5892ae...@hk2pr03mb4371.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com/ > > * A discussion on patch 10/18 about lifting the single-open constraint > > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/CAPnigKku-EjOnV9gsmnXzH=xzxsu78ileccnbsk8k2_4b4u...@mail.gmail.com/ > > I need to do a v4 to fix the bug in the Nuvoton driver. Did you have any > feedback for the remaining patches or thoughts on the discussions linked > above? I'd like to incorporate whatever I can into the series before > respinning.
This will take a little while to review, but I'll try to get to it today. Thanks, -corey > > Cheers, > > Andrew _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
