On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:22:06PM -0400, Wan Jiabing wrote:
> There are 5 duplicated 'if' conditions to judge the 'run_to_completion',
> which looks redundant. And there is no function to modify this variable.
It's modified in panic_event().
>
> Reduce the 'if' conditions from 5 times to 1 time can make code easy to
> understand and fix following coccicheck warning:
>
> ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c :4771:2-19: ERROR: nested
> lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 4764.
I'm not sure this matters that much. The comments are messed up a bit,
and probably need to be reworked. But I'm not inclined to take this.
-corey
>
> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiab...@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 38 ++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> index a60201d3f735..072da25124cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -4756,32 +4756,30 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
> unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */
> int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
>
> - /*
> - * To preserve message order, we keep a queue and deliver from
> - * a tasklet.
> - */
> - if (!run_to_completion)
> + if (!run_to_completion) {
> + /*
> + * To preserve message order, we keep a queue and deliver from
> + * a tasklet.
> + */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock, flags);
> - list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
> - if (!run_to_completion)
> + list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock,
> flags);
> -
> - if (!run_to_completion)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
> - /*
> - * We can get an asynchronous event or receive message in addition
> - * to commands we send.
> - */
> - if (msg == intf->curr_msg)
> - intf->curr_msg = NULL;
> - if (!run_to_completion)
> + /*
> + * We can get an asynchronous event or receive message in
> addition
> + * to commands we send.
> + */
> + if (msg == intf->curr_msg)
> + intf->curr_msg = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
> -
> - if (run_to_completion)
> - smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet);
> - else
> tasklet_schedule(&intf->recv_tasklet);
> + } else {
> + list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
> + if (msg == intf->curr_msg)
> + intf->curr_msg = NULL;
> + smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet);
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_smi_msg_received);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
