On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:54:31AM +0800, Cosmo Chou wrote:
> Move smbus_cmd assignment to the end of process_smbus_cmd() to ensure
> the new command is not lost when complete_response() is triggered.
Ok, I see, patch is applied. Thank you.
Quan, I assume this is ok. Please double-check it for me.
-corey
>
> Fixes: dd2bc5cc9e25 ("ipmi: ssif_bmc: Add SSIF BMC driver")
> Signed-off-by: Cosmo Chou <chou.co...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> index a14fafc583d4..7a4f52987a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> @@ -579,7 +579,6 @@ static void process_request_part(struct ssif_bmc_ctx
> *ssif_bmc)
> static void process_smbus_cmd(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> {
> /* SMBUS command can vary (single or multi-part) */
> - ssif_bmc->part_buf.smbus_cmd = *val;
> ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 1;
> memset(&ssif_bmc->part_buf.payload[0], 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
>
> @@ -596,6 +595,7 @@ static void process_smbus_cmd(struct ssif_bmc_ctx
> *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> if (ssif_bmc->aborting)
> ssif_bmc->aborting = false;
> }
> + ssif_bmc->part_buf.smbus_cmd = *val;
> }
>
> static void on_read_requested_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
