It needs to be read only once because it's used in lock/unlock
scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c 
b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 1e5313748f8b..77f0f41f2e3d 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -1882,13 +1882,12 @@ static void smi_send(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
                     const struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers,
                     struct ipmi_smi_msg *smi_msg, int priority)
 {
-       int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+       int run_to_completion = READ_ONCE(intf->run_to_completion);
        unsigned long flags = 0;
 
        if (!run_to_completion)
                spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
        smi_msg = smi_add_send_msg(intf, smi_msg, priority);
-
        if (!run_to_completion)
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
 
@@ -4753,10 +4752,10 @@ static int handle_one_recv_msg(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
  */
 static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
 {
-       struct ipmi_smi_msg  *smi_msg;
-       unsigned long        flags = 0;
-       int                  rv;
-       int                  run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+       struct ipmi_smi_msg *smi_msg;
+       unsigned long flags = 0;
+       int rv;
+       int run_to_completion = READ_ONCE(intf->run_to_completion);
 
        /* See if any waiting messages need to be processed. */
        if (!run_to_completion)
@@ -4813,7 +4812,7 @@ static void smi_recv_work(struct work_struct *t)
 {
        unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */
        struct ipmi_smi *intf = from_work(intf, t, recv_work);
-       int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+       int run_to_completion = READ_ONCE(intf->run_to_completion);
        struct ipmi_smi_msg *newmsg = NULL;
 
        /*
@@ -4843,9 +4842,9 @@ static void smi_recv_work(struct work_struct *t)
                        intf->curr_msg = newmsg;
                }
        }
-
        if (!run_to_completion)
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
+
        if (newmsg)
                intf->handlers->sender(intf->send_info, newmsg);
 
@@ -4859,7 +4858,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
                           struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg)
 {
        unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */
-       int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+       int run_to_completion = READ_ONCE(intf->run_to_completion);
 
        /*
         * To preserve message order, we keep a queue and deliver from
-- 
2.43.0



_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to