On Fri, 12 Sep 2025, Binbin Zhou wrote: > Hi Lee: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:33 PM Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 20:35:04 +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote: > > > This patchset introduces the Loongson-2K BMC. > > > > > > It is a PCIe device present on servers similar to the Loongson-3 CPUs. > > > And it is a multifunctional device (MFD), such as display as a > > > sub-function > > > of it. > > > > > > For IPMI, according to the existing design, we use software simulation to > > > implement the KCS interface registers: Stauts/Command/Data_Out/Data_In. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/3] mfd: ls2kbmc: Introduce Loongson-2K BMC core driver > > commit: 67c2639e1fc1a07b45d216af659c0dd92a370c68 > > [2/3] mfd: ls2kbmc: Add Loongson-2K BMC reset function support > > commit: 2364ccc827e44064e9763f2ae2d1dcc5f945fdf3 > > Thanks for acknowledging my patchset. > > I can't confirm why you didn't apply the IPMI patch, but this appears > to break the patchset's integrity, potentially causing missing Kconfig > dependencies (IPMI_LS2K select MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE).
Pretty sure this doesn't break anything. What build errors do you see as a result? > Additionally, as Corey previously explained[1], this patch can be > applied through your side. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ We only apply cross-subsystem patch-sets to a single tree if there are good reasons to do so. In this instance, I can't see any reason why the IPMI driver cannot go in via it's own repo. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
