Hi Grégoire,
On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 09:56 +0200, Grégoire Layet wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
> > > index 56bb3b0444f7..a93fa4cf5d8f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
> > > @@ -617,6 +617,13 @@ kcs4: kcs@114 {
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + pcie_kcs4: kcs@914 {
> >
> > Nodes need to be ordered by ascending address:
>
> The existing kcs4 node is already not in ascending order of address.
>
> 'kcs4: kcs@114' is before 'lpc_ctrl: lpc-ctrl@80'
>
> pcie_kcs4 has been placed here to have ascending addresses locally on
> the kcs nodes and still
> having all the kcs nodes next to each other. This matches the kcs4
> node ordering.
Understood, however:
>
> If ascending address is still preferred, I'll change pcie_kcs4 order of
> course.
My preference is that we don't add further style problems on top of
those we already have :)
Thanks,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
