On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 11:38:45AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > FWIW, we did raise greybus as an approach to various HW vendors; I > assume there were reasons behind OBMF-ICP, and assume some prior-art > assesment was involved, but I don't have specifics for those reasons.
greybus is patent-encumbered free so there should not be any prior-art issues involved with it and could work here just fine (with the added bonus that you only need to write a tiny host bridge driver and then suddenly all of the client drivers will "just work"). I strongly recommend that instead of going off and creating new specs and protocols that ignore prior-art. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
