> To provide proper integration with ubufox, > > 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for > their binary in > > /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
> Xbb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so this doesn't work for the current java plugins, which are installed under a different name for each plugin. -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu. Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “sun-java5” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “sun-java6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “totem” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: To provide proper integration with ubufox, 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/ and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst. 2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash: Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/) Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so -------- When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog: it gives two options: 1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin" 2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin" the second options supposedly uses openjdk. No descriptions are given whatsoever. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
