On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:02:23PM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mike Hommey <[email protected]> wrote: > > AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI > > headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for > > all rdeps we have in Debian. I think some are not NPAPI plugins. > > > > Anyways, I guess most rdeps are just using the mozilla-*.pc files. I'll > > at least add the mozilla-plugin.pc one in next upload (which I'll do > > tomorrow morning, after I confirm only armel is broken). That should > > help most. > > > >> How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead? > > Thanks, way cleaner. > > >> BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative? > >> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/642168 > > > > Definitely, yes. > > I've just uploaded it to mentors. Anyone interested in reviewing/sponsoring > it? > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/npapi-sdk
You should install a mozilla-plugin.pc pkg-config file too. (and conflict with xulrunner-dev as a consequence). That would allow packages requiring the headers to build against that package instead of xulrunner-dev without having to patch the source. That said, the source you took seems outdated, and there are a few other repos on github that have more recent headers. Also note the canonical upstream is https://code.google.com/p/npapi-sdk/source/list (and r20 is what the iceweasel source contains) Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
