On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:03:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > > Hi Tiago, hi Julian, > > > [...] > > > Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfully, but > > > jlink still fails with the "expected hash" error. It's (perhaps) > > > interesting that the expected hash does differ between the patched build > > > and the unpatched build. > > > > That's really bizarre. I checked running strip-nondeterminism on the > > resulting jmods and it seemed to be OK. But if so, then I've clearly > > overlooked something. > > I'm wondering if we just need more of it sprinkled about earlier in the > build. I didn't believe it at first and so rebuilt (more than once) to > be sure.
Hi Tony, Here are a couple more thoughts on exploring this: * Search through the build log to check that strip-nondeterminism is actually being called. If it's not, perhaps the patch has accidentally not been applied. * Run the sha256sum command (protected with a '-' in case it fails!) at several points in the build-arch and install targets to see when the hashes change, if at all. HTH, Julian _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
