I know I'm reiterating, but just to keep the point alive; personally I would still prefer to have such information placed in an explicit layout constraint class.
node.setMargin(x); layout.getChildren().add(node); vs layout.add(node, new Constraint().margin(x)); It also prevents the Node class from bloating. On 2013-06-11 14:47, Martin Sladecek wrote:
Hi, JIRA issue: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-27785 This API change is about adding marginProperty() to Node that would be then used by layout Panes instead of the current constraints (static methods getMargin/setMargin). The getMargin/setMargin on these Panes will just delegate to the property. Unfortunately, it's not possible to update Region.layoutInArea and Region.positionInArea methods to use child.getMargin() internally, as there's an overloaded method (in both cases) that already doesn't have Margin in it's parameters and uses Insets.EMPTY instead. Changing this to child.getMargin() might cause backward incompatibility issues. Thanks, -Martin