I know I'm reiterating, but just to keep the point alive; personally I would 
still prefer to have such information placed in an explicit layout constraint 
class.

node.setMargin(x); layout.getChildren().add(node);
vs
layout.add(node, new Constraint().margin(x));

It also prevents the Node class from bloating.




On 2013-06-11 14:47, Martin Sladecek wrote:
Hi,

JIRA issue: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-27785
This API change is about adding marginProperty() to Node that would be then 
used by layout Panes instead of the current constraints (static methods 
getMargin/setMargin). The getMargin/setMargin on these Panes will just delegate 
to the property.

Unfortunately, it's not possible to update Region.layoutInArea and 
Region.positionInArea methods to use child.getMargin() internally, as there's 
an overloaded method (in both cases) that already doesn't have Margin in it's 
parameters and uses Insets.EMPTY instead. Changing this to child.getMargin() 
might cause backward incompatibility issues.

Thanks,
-Martin


Reply via email to