Have you decided, how you will make the bridge near the current
FXMLLoader class. Particularly, will it be understandable by Proguard
for better inlining and further reduce bytecode?
Example: if a specific FXML is only loaded in one method of an
application, all the FXMLLoader code can theoretically be replaced
directly by the generated Java code building the object as defined by
FXML, but without any indirection layer.
Thanks,
Gaja.
I don't think it is a good idea to use fxml on embedded and mobile, we are working
on a fxml => java converter so you can add it to your build process.
Tom
