I absolutely agree!
Am 09.08.2013 um 09:17 schrieb Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com>: > I have a very good feeling about JavaOne this year. It's now or never for > Java/JavaFX on mobiles and tablets and judging by the session titles, I think > Oracle is going to make a lot of people very happy :-) > > > On 9 August 2013 16:26, Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wtf? Oracle guys, what JVM is this session going to use? > > https://oracleus.activeevents.com/2013/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=5517 > > > On 09/08/2013, at 3:51 PM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote: > > > Daniel, the question is: Which surprise will Oracle show on JavaOne 2013 in > > september? Maybe there is something official concerning JavaFX and iOS and > > Android…? Please take a look a the planned tracks: > > http://blog.software4java.com/?p=97 > > One track talks about „JavaSE in AOT mode“…so maybe we do not need such a > > backport in the future? Because Oracle does not say anything about the > > future, we don’t know it at the moment ;) > > > > Best regards, > > Tobi > > > > > > Am 09.08.2013 um 00:08 schrieb Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com>: > > > >> No, I didn't get a chance. Probably easier for you to just raise it now? > >> > >> It's going to be a pretty big round loop to get ios fixes in. It first > >> needs to go into jfx then needs to be merged into the backport, then that > >> needs to be deployed to maven, then the maven plugin needs to be updated > >> to refer to the new version, then the maven plugin needs to be deployed to > >> maven. > >> > >> I could simplify the last step by allowing the version of jfx backport to > >> be configurable. > >> > >> As I've raised in previous emails, help would be good. I don't suppose any > >> oracle people could be allocated to merging changed into the backport on a > >> regular basis (eg weekly) - even on an unofficial, non-publicly-commited > >> arrangement? > >> > >> > >> On 09/08/2013, at 7:38 AM, steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> Did you log a bug for the TextField problem? If you have not done so, > >>> please do. If you use "iOS:" as a prefix for the title of the bug and > >>> use iOS as a label, that should help people find iOS related bugs. I > >>> have a fix for the problem you are seeing. The text skin thinks that > >>> because iOS has touch, it needs to show resize handles in the text field. > >>> > >>> Steve > >>> > >>> On 01/08/2013 6:08 PM, Daniel Zwolenski wrote: > >>>> So now the Maven stuff is working ( > >>>> http://www.zenjava.com/2013/08/01/javafx-on-ios-using-robovm-and-maven/), > >>>> I'm gradually starting to muck around with the iOS stuff. > >>>> > >>>> There are problems - how do I raise them? Should I log JIRAs? Should I > >>>> bring them up here, etc? Will you guys start running jfx on iOS now that > >>>> it's possible and are bug fixes within your allowance to work on given > >>>> iOS > >>>> is not a supported platform? > >>>> > >>>> For example, in the hello world example, I've included a TextField. When > >>>> I > >>>> start typing in it on my iPad the field starts changing size to > >>>> accommodate > >>>> the auto-correction popup, which looks very weird. Should I log that as a > >>>> bug against Controls? > >>> > > >
