Actually you are privy to the original discussion -- it is all in the mailing 
list history :-)

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2013-March/006725.html

The long and the short of it -- getting the generics right in a way that 
allowed for API evolution turned out to be a nightmare from which we couldn't 
recover.

Richard

On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was not privy to the original discussion but I am lead to believe that 
> Builders are no longer considered fashionable and that we are advised not to 
> use them.
> 
> While I realise that every type of Node basically needed its own Builder, 
> could someone please outline why this situation has arisen?  Is it something 
> to do with "fluent APIs" themselves or some other reason?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Felix

Reply via email to