> I am with you on the "design pattern" approach you refer to which is 
> basically a higher level of abstraction than say one which actually specifies 
> which widget types to use.
> But who is this "someone who loves the target platform" and how and when do 
> they get to hook-in the actual widgets?
> While I agree JavaFX certainly has the ability to implement the high-level 
> abstraction layer (as does pretty much any programming language, how 
> (physically speaking) is someone going to link this with an actual selection 
> of widgets on each OS?  Isn't *that* the whole problem here?

That’s JavaFX, CSS and FXML, with the native platform shining though thanks to 
the platform API.


Reply via email to