Also, if "none" is the answer for "Unit test", then we should add a
label added to indicate why there is no unit (regression) test. For
example "noreg-hard" or "noreg-build". See the following:
http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#noreg
In the case of this specific bug "noreg-trivial" seems like a reasonable
answer. We didn't do this consistently for FX 8, but it will help in
testing / verification if we all do this for FX 8u20 and forward.
Better still, if a regression test is possible we should add one.
Thanks.
-- Kevin
Stephen F Northover wrote:
Hi all,
I gentle reminder. When others need to verify a bug, they need to
know what code was run to test the fix. In the case of RT-34820 and
many others, if you read the JIRA, you can find out pretty quickly.
However it's nicer if there is a standard comment at the end of the
JIRA so people can scan it quickly. Something like:
Tested-with: Ensemble
Unit Tests: none
Standard templates in comments really help out a lot for manager guys
when they need to scan a billion JIRA and try to grasp quickly what is
going on.
Here is the wiki entry that describes this (hidden at the bottom of
the page)
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
Thanks,
Steve
On 2013-12-13 10:30 AM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
Hello,
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-34820
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/8a5c6817206d
Thanks,
Vadim
