Excellent idea. I'm glad I thought of it. ;^) On Dec 19, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Lisa Selle <lisa.se...@oracle.com> wrote:
> BTW, if you are spending time on this ;) it would be worthwhile to also be > able to choose large "groups" of associated tests (rather than having to > hand-select 27 different controls test, for example). Something like basic > graphics, extended graphics, all controls, media, 3D, etc. > > What do you think? > > Lisa > > On 12/19/2013 10:47 AM, David Grieve wrote: >> I typically ran rt-closed/toys/run-many.sh >> >> On the plane to Houston, I started playing with a UI that will list all of >> the Hello applications with a list of checkboxes that you can use to select >> what you want to run. Worthwhile? >> >> On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Lisa Selle <lisa.se...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm working on getting us some better test lists to run (besides just >>> ensemble). David, you mentioned in the meeting yesterday that the >>> toys/HelloXXX offered better coverage on controls in general than ensemble. >>> Could you come up with a reasonable list of HelloXXX controls tests that >>> could be run in, say, 1/2 hour? Then I'll put together a run script >>> similar to run-many.sh and that will be one of the test assignments. >>> >>> Thanks for your help in this! >>> >>> Lisa >
