Excellent idea. I'm glad I thought of it. ;^)

On Dec 19, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Lisa Selle <lisa.se...@oracle.com> wrote:

> BTW, if you are spending time on this ;) it would be worthwhile to also be 
> able to choose large "groups" of associated tests (rather than having to 
> hand-select 27 different controls test, for example).  Something like basic 
> graphics, extended graphics, all controls, media, 3D, etc.
> What do you think?
> Lisa
> On 12/19/2013 10:47 AM, David Grieve wrote:
>> I typically ran rt-closed/toys/run-many.sh
>> On the plane to Houston, I started playing with a UI that will list all of 
>> the Hello applications with a list of checkboxes that you can use to select 
>> what you want to run. Worthwhile?
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Lisa Selle <lisa.se...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I'm working on getting us some better test lists to run (besides just 
>>> ensemble).  David, you mentioned in the meeting yesterday that the 
>>> toys/HelloXXX offered better coverage on controls in general than ensemble. 
>>>  Could you come up with a reasonable list of HelloXXX controls tests that 
>>> could be run in, say, 1/2 hour?  Then I'll put together a run script 
>>> similar to run-many.sh and that will be one of the test assignments.
>>> Thanks for your help in this!
>>> Lisa

Reply via email to