Yes, that has already been resolved in my local repo - I noticed it after the webrev was generated.
Thanks, -- Jonathan Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity. On 15 August 2014 19:05:07 GMT+12:00, Ali Ebrahimi <ali.ebrahimi1...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >What do you think about this constants in javafx public API: > >+ // represented as a ButtonType >+ public static final String BUTTON_DATA_PROPERTY = >"controlfx.button.type"; //$NON-NLS-1$ >+ >+ // allows to exclude button from uniform resizing >+ public static final String BUTTON_SIZE_INDEPENDENCE = >"controlfx.button.size.indepenence"; //$NON-NLS-1$ > >may be you want javafx.button instead of controlfx.button, No? > >Ali Ebrahimi > > >On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jonathan Giles ><jonathan.gi...@oracle.com> >wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After much discussion a 'final' JavaFX Dialogs API has been created >and is >> awaiting final review. The plan is to integrate this into the 8udev >repo >> before it is promoted early next week. >> >> The Jira discussion for the dialogs API is long, but very >informative. You >> can find it here: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-12643 >> The webrev can be found here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ >> kcr/RT-12643/webrev.00/ >> >> Any comments should be directed into the jira issue, rather than >discussed >> on this list (so that we can keep everything in one place). >> >> Thanks, >> Jonathan >>
