On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:49:09 +0200, Tom Eugelink <t...@tbee.org> wrote:
I do not understand these doubts, JBS is Jira?!
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview
/The JDK bug system (JBS) ... is a JIRA instance which provides bug
tracking for Projects in the OpenJDK/
I think that this is clear to everybody. The point is that Jira is
extremely flexible in configuring access policies and two instances can be
very different in terms of usability. With Jira/JBS I was referring to the
two instances and their currently configured access policies. A few people
pointed out in the previous emails about these differences.
In other words, consolidating to JBS is fine: but, as many expressed
doubts, does it mean that the JavaFX component will be subject to the same
configuration of JBS? Or is it possible to have its access policy, as a
component, to stay the same? What about having the access policy of JBS
more open, such as the current JIRA for OpenJFX?
I suppose these are more legal issues, or internal Oracle policy issues,
than technical issues.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
