Since this is a serious regression I see no barrier to backporting it to
8u-dev. Presuming that happens before late October, then it would make
the 8u72 release (mid-January).
-- Kevin
David Gilbert wrote:
I ran into exactly this issue today, it would be great to see it fixed in a
release soon.
Best regards,
David Gilbert
http://www.jfree.org/
On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:21, faste...@swingempire.de wrote:
Thanks for the info and filing an issue :-)
Cheers
Jeanette
Zitat von Leif Samuelsson <leif.samuels...@oracle.com>:
This is a regression in 8u60. I have filed a new issue for this and I hope that
we can backport a fix to an 8u release.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136838
Leif
On 2015-09-21 06:38, faste...@swingempire.de wrote:
short description (for a complete description and a workaround see
http://stackoverflow.com/q/32620739/203657):
edit the text in an editable comboBox, focus another control - expected: the
edited text is committed (aka: combo's value changed), actual: combo's value
unchanged
Worked as expected in u45 (and supposedly u51 which I don't have on my machine)
- intentional change or regression?
Cheers
Jeanette
