There are no public types exported by javafx.deploy so the change to use that module seems unneeded (I see that you used to include the SWT classes, which is likely what you want, but for which we don't yet have a solution in JDK 9).

Everything else looks good to me.

+1

-- Kevin


Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
The code was reworked to use jrtfs: instead of reading from javafx.jar.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8075550/webrev/index.html
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075550



Reply via email to