https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784242565357568
The Gluon blog post from a few months ago (when @robovm was acquired by > @xamarin) is still almost entirely relevant > http://gluonhq.com/gluon-supports-multiple-jvms/ On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Felix Bembrick <[email protected]> wrote: > So what do they use instead? > > > On 19 Apr 2016, at 02:52, Steve Hannah <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this. > > https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively > "shutting > >> down". > >> > >> https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/ > >> > >> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making > >> JavaFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that > >> goal? > >> > >> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? > Or > >> is the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable > cross > >> platform technology? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Felix > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steve Hannah > > Web Lite Solutions Corp. > > > > --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17 > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > <div dir=3D"ltr">According to Gluon, they're not impacted by > this.<div>= > > <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041";> > https://t= > > witter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041 > </a><br></div><div><br></div><d= > > iv><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div > class=3D"gmail_quote= > > ">On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <span > dir=3D"ltr"><<a = > > href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"; > target=3D"_blank">felix.bembrick@g= > > mail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" > style= > > =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I > just r= > > ead this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting > dow= > > n".<br> > > <br> > > <a href=3D"https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/"; > rel=3D"noreferrer" = > > target=3D"_blank">https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/</a><br> > > <br> > > Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making > Jav= > > aFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that > goal?= > > <br> > > <br> > > Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? > Or i= > > s the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable > cross p= > > latform technology?<br> > > <br> > > Thanks,<br> > > <br> > > Felix</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div > cl= > > ass=3D"gmail_signature">Steve Hannah<div>Web Lite Solutions > Corp.</div></di= > > v> > > </div> > > > > --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17-- > > --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this. > > https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively > "shutting > >> down". > >> > >> https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/ > >> > >> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making > >> JavaFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that > >> goal? > >> > >> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? > Or > >> is the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable > cross > >> platform technology? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Felix > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steve Hannah > > Web Lite Solutions Corp. > > > > --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17 > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > <div dir=3D"ltr">According to Gluon, they're not impacted by > this.<div>= > > <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041";> > https://t= > > witter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041 > </a><br></div><div><br></div><d= > > iv><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div > class=3D"gmail_quote= > > ">On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <span > dir=3D"ltr"><<a = > > href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"; > target=3D"_blank">felix.bembrick@g= > > mail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" > style= > > =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I > just r= > > ead this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting > dow= > > n".<br> > > <br> > > <a href=3D"https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/"; > rel=3D"noreferrer" = > > target=3D"_blank">https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/</a><br> > > <br> > > Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making > Jav= > > aFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that > goal?= > > <br> > > <br> > > Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? > Or i= > > s the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable > cross p= > > latform technology?<br> > > <br> > > Thanks,<br> > > <br> > > Felix</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div > cl= > > ass=3D"gmail_signature">Steve Hannah<div>Web Lite Solutions > Corp.</div></di= > > v> > > </div> > > > > --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17-- > -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.
