Thanks for the links, Kevin. By a quick glimpse, it seems like Tom's proposal could be used to solve all three.
Tomas On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > As Thomas notes, this is independent of JDK 9 or Jigsaw. We have a couple > similar RFEs filed: > > JDK-8092262 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8092262>: Add > Application.launch(ApplicationFactory,String... args) > JDK-8091703 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091703>: Support > for Dependency Injection in Application > JDK-8090838 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090838>: Add > Application launching support for dynamic languages > > This would be another variation of the JavaFX life-cycle and is something > we could consider for a future release (or even a JDK 9 update release) if > there were enough interest in doing this. > > -- Kevin > > > > Tomas Mikula wrote: > > I think what Tom proposes makes sense even regardless of Java 9. Another > benefit is not requiring a no-arg constructor. > > Regards, > Tomas > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> > <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I was playing around with Java9 a bit yesterday things worked fine but > what disturbs me a bit is that I need to export the package with my > Application-Subclass because naturally Java9 can not create an instance > of none-exported class with reflection. > > Although not being a big problem it disturbed me a bit and from my basic > understanding I think it should be possible to introduce a 3rd variant > of Application.launch() who looks like this: > > Application#launch(Application,String...) > > This way no reflection is needed by the jfx bootstrap code. > > Tom > > -- > Thomas Schindl, CTO > BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH > Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruckhttp://www.bestsolution.at/ > Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck > > > >
