+1 :) "This is imo the most important work right now, and a number of people are working on it.
Advertising
I am very positive this [both paths] will be realised before the Java 11 release date. " On 6 April 2018 at 01:21, <openjfx-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net> wrote: > Send openjfx-dev mailing list submissions to > openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/openjfx-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openjfx-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openjfx-dev-ow...@openjdk.java.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of openjfx-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: gradle :web:test fails (Kevin Rushforth) > 2. Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? (Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN) > 3. Re: Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? (Kevin Rushforth) > 4. Re: Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? (Johan Vos) > 5. Re: gradle :web:test fails (Nir Lisker) > 6. Re: HEADS-UP: Proposal to bump the minimum boot JDK for FX to > JDK 10 (Kevin Rushforth) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 05:01:13 -0700 > From: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > To: Murali Billa <murali.bi...@oracle.com> > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing" > <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: gradle :web:test fails > Message-ID: <5ac61009.9080...@oracle.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Yes, this is very likely the issue. If you take the jfxwebkit.dll from > the latest EA build of JDK 11 then you should be fine. Alternatively, if > you have the patience to build webkit from source (at least once) then > you can use that. > > Johan had a good idea that gradle :web:test should produce a warning if > COMPILE_WEBKIT is false [1]. > > I just now filed a bug [2] to track this. > > -- Kevin > > [1] > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/19#issuecomment- > 378521501 > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201176 > > > Murali Billa wrote: > > Hi Lisker, > > > > +one more point: > > > > I think you are not compiling webkit . The command "gradle :web:test" > picks the webkit dll from JDK (which can have older versions like 10 / 9) . > > > > You can compile webkit with command " gradle -PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true > :web:test" and in this case webkit dll will be picked up from your source > code repo (not from JDK). > > > > Thanks, > > Murali > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Murali Billa > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 10:19 AM > > To: Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com>; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > Mailing <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > > Subject: RE: gradle :web:test fails > > > > Hi Lisker, > > > > Can you print the value of useragentString ? Looks like you are using > fxversion as 11 (you can print this value from > System.getProperty("javafx.runtime.version");) > but the useragentstring does not contain 11. > > > > final WebView webView = new WebView(); > > final WebEngine webEngine = webView.getEngine(); > System.out.println(webEngine.getUserAgent()); > > > > > > Thanks, > > Murali > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:03 AM > > To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > > Subject: gradle :web:test fails > > > > I'm running :web:test in revision 10889 and getting the following failing > > test: > > > > test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest > testUserAgentString FAILED > > java.lang.AssertionError: UserAgentString does not contain JavaFX/11 > > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) > > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43) > > at > > test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest.lambda$testUserAgentString$12( > MiscellaneousTest.java:441) > > > > 379 tests completed, 1 failed, 12 skipped :web:test FAILED > > > > Is this known? > > > > - Nir > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:12:32 +0000 > From: Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN <mikael.christen...@qiagen.com> > To: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? > Message-ID: > <HE1PR05MB1675F1A89E46E2614CB53A16EDBB0@HE1PR05MB1675. > eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > This is a question about Oracle's statement that JavaFX will no longer be > part of the SDK starting from Java 11: > https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/the-future-of- > javafx-and-other-java-client-roadmap-updates > > Is the plan, that when Java 11 is released (scheduled for September 2018), > it will be possible to download a (prebuilt) JavaFX component from the > OpenJFX? > > Best, Mikael. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 05:21:46 -0700 > From: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > To: Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN <mikael.christen...@qiagen.com> > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? > Message-ID: <5ac614da.1090...@oracle.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Yes, this is the plan. There has been quite a lot of discussion on this, > so I invite you to search the email archives [1]. Specifically, the > recent "modules versus SDK's" thread [2]. You are welcome to join the > mailing list [3] and contribute to the discussion if you like. > > -- Kevin > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/ > [2] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-March/021624.html > [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/openjfx-dev > > > Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a question about Oracle's statement that JavaFX will no longer > be part of the SDK starting from Java 11: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/the-future-of- > javafx-and-other-java-client-roadmap-updates > > > > Is the plan, that when Java 11 is released (scheduled for September > 2018), it will be possible to download a (prebuilt) JavaFX component from > the OpenJFX? > > > > Best, Mikael. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:29:54 +0000 > From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> > To: Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN <mikael.christen...@qiagen.com> > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: Will OpenJFX have a release ready in time for the Java 11 > launch? > Message-ID: > <CABxFH2HUHfv3MjR8hSra=xG25g1p27mPWTy07JDe9M9KR==xSw@ > mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Yes, that is the plan. > > Actually, there are 2 paths: > 1. create a JavaFX SDK (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ > browse/JDK-8198329 > ) > 2. create and upload the JavaFX modules to the traditional, popular > repositories (maven central, bintray) and make sure developers can use the > API's using maven/gradle (see > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/52) > > This is imo the most important work right now, and a number of people are > working on it. > > I am very positive this [both paths] will be realised before the Java 11 > release date. > > - Johan > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:25 PM Mikael Christensen - QIAGEN < > mikael.christen...@qiagen.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a question about Oracle's statement that JavaFX will no longer be > > part of the SDK starting from Java 11: > > > > https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/the-future-of- > javafx-and-other-java-client-roadmap-updates > > > > Is the plan, that when Java 11 is released (scheduled for September > 2018), > > it will be possible to download a (prebuilt) JavaFX component from the > > OpenJFX? > > > > Best, Mikael. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 02:14:14 +0300 > From: Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> > To: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing" > <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: gradle :web:test fails > Message-ID: > <CA+0ynh_zOYU8D9PjrZa98qmJOkPDEpNGz61g+ > -mtyf9yaye...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Yes, I didn't build Webkit and the JDK is 10, but I thought the Webkit > tests would be skipped if it weren't built. > > The filed bug should do it. Thanks. > > - Nir > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 15:01 Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > Yes, this is very likely the issue. If you take the jfxwebkit.dll from > > the latest EA build of JDK 11 then you should be fine. Alternatively, if > > you have the patience to build webkit from source (at least once) then > > you can use that. > > > > Johan had a good idea that gradle :web:test should produce a warning if > > COMPILE_WEBKIT is false [1]. > > > > I just now filed a bug [2] to track this. > > > > -- Kevin > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/19#issuecomment- > > 378521501 > > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201176 > > > > > > Murali Billa wrote: > > > Hi Lisker, > > > > > > +one more point: > > > > > > I think you are not compiling webkit . The command "gradle :web:test" > > picks the webkit dll from JDK (which can have older versions like 10 / > 9) . > > > > > > You can compile webkit with command " gradle -PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true > > :web:test" and in this case webkit dll will be picked up from your source > > code repo (not from JDK). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Murali > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Murali Billa > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 10:19 AM > > > To: Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com>; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > > Mailing <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > > > Subject: RE: gradle :web:test fails > > > > > > Hi Lisker, > > > > > > Can you print the value of useragentString ? Looks like you are using > > fxversion as 11 (you can print this value from > System.getProperty("javafx.runtime.version");) > > but the useragentstring does not contain 11. > > > > > > final WebView webView = new WebView(); > > > final WebEngine webEngine = webView.getEngine(); > > System.out.println(webEngine.getUserAgent()); > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Murali > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:03 AM > > > To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net > > > > > Subject: gradle :web:test fails > > > > > > I'm running :web:test in revision 10889 and getting the following > failing > > > test: > > > > > > test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest > testUserAgentString FAILED > > > java.lang.AssertionError: UserAgentString does not contain > JavaFX/11 > > > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) > > > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43) > > > at > > > test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest.lambda$testUserAgentString$12( > > MiscellaneousTest.java:441) > > > > > > 379 tests completed, 1 failed, 12 skipped :web:test FAILED > > > > > > Is this known? > > > > > > - Nir > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:21:02 -0700 > From: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > To: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Proposal to bump the minimum boot JDK for FX to > JDK 10 > Message-ID: <5ac6bd6e.5090...@oracle.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I created a pull request [3] for this, and discovered that the CI builds > for the GitHub sandbox are using JDK 9.0.4. Michael Ennen is fixing this > by switching both the Travis and Appveyor CI builds to use JDK 10 [4]. > > Given the disruptive nature of bumping the minimum, I think it is wise > to wait another day or two before taking any action on my proposal to > bump the minimum (we can and should still proceed to upgrade the CI > builds to use JDK 10). This will give others who might have concerns a > chance to comment. > > Comments? > > -- Kevin > > [3] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/61 > > [4] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/63 > > > Kevin Rushforth wrote: > > As mentioned in another thread [1] we should update the minimum boot > > JDK used to build FX to 10, which will allow the use of JDK 10 > > langauge features, such as 'var', as well as JDK 10 APIs. It's also > > the right time to do this in general. I filed a new RFE [2] to track > > this and plan to send it out for review next week. > > > > Please let me know if there are any concerns. We already use JDK 10 to > > build FX 11 ea bits. I presume that the travis and appveyor CI builds > > of the github mirror do the same? > > > > -- Kevin > > > > [1] > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018- > March/021671.html > > > > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200446 > > > > > End of openjfx-dev Digest, Vol 77, Issue 9 > ****************************************** >
